Arcus Health cut clinical documentation time by 26%.
An evaluated AI drafting workflow, embedded in the clinical systems staff already use, across 38 hospital sites.
Arcus had trialled three clinical AI products, and clinicians had abandoned all three. The pattern was consistent: each tool lived outside the clinical workflow, so using it cost more time than it saved.
Vertane took the opposite approach — no new interface. We embedded drafting and summarization into the existing clinical documentation system, built an evaluation set from two thousand reviewed historical notes, and kept a clinician approval step in the loop permanently rather than treating it as temporary scaffolding.
Documentation time fell 26% across the pilot sites, and adoption held above 80% a year after rollout — the number the previous three attempts never reached.
Facing something similar?
We'll give you a straight assessment of your environment in two weeks.
Start a conversation